One thing that's pretty clear about comic fans: They can sometimes be an ornery bunch... or at least the vocal ones can. <p>Just look at the number of blogs and message boards and Facebook posts about comics - and particularly <i>negative</i> or <i>outraged</i> posts - and it becomes clear just how fired up some comic fans can get. <p>Now you can paint a group of diverse people with a similar interest with only so broad a brush, but there are certain things lots of fans do share in common. <p>Some fans are <i>still</i> voicing anger about DC's reboot two years later, particularly now that company announced another <a href=http://www.newsarama.com/20436-dc-s-september-2014-event-revealed-3d-covers-return.html>weekly series and another line-wide September event with "gimmick" covers</a>. Fans and bloggers moan about each and every Marvel relaunch (which, to be fair, are now frequent). Heck, even today's somewhat obscure <a href=http://www.newsarama.com/20453-meet-your-tv-flash-in-costume.html>first look at the costume of TV's new Flash</a> brought out some complainers. <p>So with all that in mind Newsarama is counting down its Top 10 Sure-Fire Ways to Get Comic Fans Riled Up.
Retcons are common in comic books. But when retcons are used to explain away continuity errors, comic fans have a tough time accepting it. <p>And when we say tough time, we mean there will probably be blood. <p>Fans can be forgiving about little glitches, like when Batman's former Robin Tim Drake was no longer called Robin (adding "Red" in hindsight), or when Bucky Barnes' time as a cute kid sidekick got changed to make him a special forces super-assassin. But the big problems arise when comic writers get a little wild with their explanations of continuity glitches. Then again, they can do that because...well, this is comics. <p>I mean, come on... when you have aliens, ghosts and flying men, why can't it follow that it wasn't <i>really</i> Magneto under that Xorn mask, but was actually Xorn's brother pretending to be Magneto pretending to be Xorn? And sure, Jason Todd died, but in a world where Superboy-Prime can watch reality from behind a glass wall, couldn't his punch also crack that reality and bring characters back to life? <p>Uh... maybe not. <p>But whatever the explanation, the word "retcon" is usually met with a type of disdain reserved for few other things in comics, except maybe...
Kudos to all the manga fans out there, because they've had an uphill battle when trying to sell those wares to American comic book fans. <p>For many die-hard superhero fans, the words "manga-inspired" might as well be accompanied by an insult of their mother. The response is often just as violent. <p>All the ire probably stems from the fact that, about 10 years ago when the Japanese "manga" style was the hot new thing, many American comic book companies tried to tap into what they thought was a gold mine. Manga spin-offs and imprints started popping up everywhere, with manga interpretations of many tried-and-true superheroes. <p>Some fans were so angered by the "invasion" of manga-inspired art into superhero comics that they revolted against anything even resembling the style. And some of them still do. As <a href="http://www.cracked.com/funny-5082-top-5-worst-alternate-reality-stories-in-comics/">one blogger recently put it</a>, "Marvel MangaVerse made me drop the company altogether for <i>years</i>. I still haven't completely forgiven them."
Hollywood has to tread lightly with this one, because it's a very fine line. There are, apparently, plenty of small changes to comic book characters that are OK to make for the movie adaptations. Jarvis the butler as a computer? OK. Joker's smile made by scars instead of chemicals? Alright. <p>But other changes are seen by some as comic book blasphemy. <p>Yet the plethora of superhero films that are hitting the big screens have tempered the outrage a bit, as fans get used to the changes. After the heated online fan discussion about Perry White in <i>Man of Steel</i> being played by black actor Laurence Fishburne, fans were a little more accepting when Marvel recently announced that black actor Michael B. Jordan was cast as the Human Torch in its new film version of Fantastic Four. <p>But a lot of fans didn't give the <i>Iron Man</i> franchise the same flexibility, reacting negatively when the third movie's "twist" changed Marvel's villain, The Mandarin, into a bumbling idiot. Now <i>The Avengers</i> sequel, titled <i>Age of Ultron</i>, apparently <a href="http://www.newsarama.com/18454-report-joss-whedon-says-avengers-age-of-ultron-is-origin-story-no-hank-pym.html">doesn't even include Ultron's creator from the comics, the heroic Hank Pym</a>. Will comic fans accept the omission? Maybe <i>Avengers</i> director Joss Whedon has earned the same type of leniency as Nolan. Plus, Marvel is likely throwing fans a bone by announcing that their <i>Ant-Man</i> movie <i>will</i> feature Pym.
No, we're not talking about the Garth Ennis/Steve Dillon comic. <p>It's the comic books that take an "issue" and explore it from a character's point of view. <p>Some of the most respected writers in fiction wrap their plots around thinly veiled stands on socio-political views. <p>But in comics, it has to be thickly veiled. <p>In fact, hidden would work better for some. <p>Fan outrage over preachy comics probably reached its height in 2008, when the U.S. presidential election had comics like <i>DC Universe: Decisions</i> exploring superhero politics, and characters like <i>Savage Dragon</i> taking sides. <p>While the 2012 election didn't see as many political comics, the past year has seen creators tentatively tying into the "Occupy" movement, to mixed results. <p>As Geoff Johns <a href="http://www.newsarama.com/comics/geoff-johns-talks-aquaman-110329.html">once told Newsarama</a> when we asked about the potential for environmental issues in his <i>Aquaman</i> run: "Aquaman cares about that, and it's central to who he is. But you have to be careful not to be preachy."
Yeah, that's a broad title, considering a lot of changes in comics go unexplained. But in the case of loyal comic fans, who know all the details of their favorite characters' pasts, <i>not</i> knowing or understanding is akin to torture. <p>And it's exactly where DC finds itself since its reboot, as the publisher has slowly been revealing drastic changes in the history of several iconic characters and timelines that don't seem to add up... but it hasn't yet explained how all those changes happened. Even the #0 issues that DC released in September 2012 didn't address all the questions. Walk into any comic shop, and you'll surely hear someone ask, "How could Batman have three Robins and a 10-year-old son fathered by a villain's daughter when he's only been a superhero for a little over five years?" Maybe the current <i>Batman: Zero Year</i> will finally clear that up? <p>That type of unexplained continuity change is enough to make some comic fans' heads explode. <p>If anyone understands the importance of explaining details for a change, it's the people behind Spider-Man and Mary Jane's marriage elimination. For most of the "Brand New Day" era of Spider-Man, fans wouldn't recognize even the best of the storylines because... well... there were <i>still things not explained</i>. <p>You might as well strap them down so their forehead is under a dripping faucet.
It's becoming the trend in stories about superheroes, whether it's the constant releases of new #1 issues from Marvel, or DC's still-controversial reboot — and announcement this week that their slew of upcoming future-based comics are only "possible futures" (and thus will probably change). <p>Heck, even the movie industry is going at it — in less than 10 years, we've seen multiple versions of the Hulk and Punisher, with a new Fantastic Four and Batman coming soon. <p>When something isn't working — or the story seems to be finished — or someone sneezed too hard or something — companies and/or writers just start over, either discarding or ignoring the last creative team's work. That's all well and good in some storytelling media, but in <i>ongoing</i> comics? That are supposed to be, you know, <i>ongoing</i>? Let's just say, fans are getting a little heated over it. <p>Comic fans like to have a knowledge of their favorite characters. But when there's a new #1 issue, a new origin story and a new actor or approach every couple years — or <i>months</i> — they're going to start voicing concern. And not in a nice way.
For the last few years, a hot topic on the angry comic book blogosphere has been women in comics. And that includes female <i>characters</i>, who have had a tough go of it over the years. <p>In 1999, now-famed comic book writer Gail Simone and a handful of friends <a href="http://www.unheardtaunts.com/wir/">started a website called Women in Refrigerators</a> that bemoaned the all-too-frequent use of female characters as disposable plot devices. <p>By disposable, we mean women were being killed in comics. A lot. Like, chopped up and shoved into refrigerators. <p>And according to the website, it appeared the women were being killed and suffering other indignities (see left) solely for the sake of challenging <i>male</i> comic heroes. <p>It didn't take long for the phrase "women in refrigerators" to catch on. And the idea became ingrained in the minds of comic fans. <p><i>Earth 2</i> writer Tom Taylor <a href="http://www.newsarama.com/19662-unfridging-lois-just-one-of-the-surprises-tom-taylor-plans-for-dc-s-earth-2.html">just used the term a few months ago</a> when he told Newsarama he was "unfringing" Lois Lane — in other words, bringing her back to life from an allegedly meaningless death. Woe to the writer who kills a woman (or even creates <i>any</i> character solely to kill them for motivation of the "hero") on a comic page flippantly. Watch out writers — the "Women in Refrigerators" phrase will get whipped out quicker than her blood can run onto the floor. And scandal will follow.
We're treading lightly here, because wow.... the reaction to DC's announcement in 2012 that a Green Lantern would go from being a straight character to a gay one spurred a huge reaction in the mainstream press, as well as among comic fans (incidentally, it didn't seem to affect <i>Earth 2</i>'s sales, which have been steady but not overwhelmingly good or bad). DC has made it clear that more characters will have their race and gender changed to add diversity, after Marvel added a half-black, half-Hispanic Spider-Man in 2011 to heated fan reaction. <p>It's an ongoing issue that <a href="http://www.newsarama.com/comics/2011-hot-button-superhero-diversity-110112.html">Newsarama explored in detail in 2011, when a lot of feathers were being ruffled</a>. At the center of the controversy is not whether there should be characters of color, but instead whether they're characters of color for the "sake of diversity." <p>Apparently, that <i>matters</i> to a sect of comic fans. <p>And we're not the only ones treading lightly. Even Dan DiDio, co-publisher at DC, was careful to temper his language when asked about diversity a few years ago... <p>"What we've always said is that we don't want to push this in," he said," so that it feels natural and the fans come on board if it's part of the overarching story not a 'program.'"
Sure, this literary device can tick off readers of just about any fictional story, but in comics, even something that <i>resembles</i> a complete surprise will get many fans worked up as they label it a "deus ex machina." <p>Never mind that comics have a long tradition of using the device. For years, Batman's utility belt, or Reed Richards' handy devices would act as clever little surprise saviors. And magical characters like Doctor Strange and Phantom Stranger were always around for a quick, last-minute save. <p>But maybe that's the problem. Because comic fans have been reading so many stories over the years that anything surprising can be upsetting to the point of outrage. <p>As <a href="http://www.newsarama.com/comics/bill-willingham-2-fables-110726.html">writer Bill Willingham once explained to Newsarama readers</a>, "one of the operative elements of deus ex machina, which is looked upon in writing as a cheat to readers, is that it comes out of nowhere."
This one could actually just be called "deaths," because if it's a comic fan's favorite character, it'll be near impossible to make that death "meaningful." <p>But really, the more hurried and unexplained a death is, the worse the outcry from fans of the character is. <p>And the higher the quantity or more violent the destruction, the worse the reaction. Whether it's a whole slew of Avengers members in <i>Disassembled</i> or a bevy of Titans in <i>Infinite Crisis</i>, the response will be predictably angry. <p>It's such a bad prospect for a fan to lose his/her favorite character that even the <i>threat</i> of a death can get an outraged response. The insinuation by DC that Nightwing <i>might</i>, <i>maybe</i> be dying in <i>Forever Evil</i> has the blogosphere threatening boycotts before the story's outcome is known. And copy for <i>Futures End</i> that talks about a hero dying has fans busting out the eye rolls emoticons months before the story even starts.